Last year, I wrote about how one of my articles, which had previously appeared at the top of the search results, was swallowed up on the page of artificial intelligence. Google ultimately modified how the sources were martyred and added more links alongside individual paragraphs.
While publishers seem primarily interested in the wave of research tools from artificial intelligence who wandered in visitors who would go directly to the sources of information online, some marketers find these visitors who end up landing on their promotional sites of higher quality. “We definitely see the traffic that you get more involved,” he says. Jim UThe founder and CEO of BRIGHTEDGE, the platform of senior economic officials for the marketing. “By the time they made three other reactions with artificial intelligence, then click on my website, it is better qualified. So, the participation standards, such as time at site and conversion rates.”
to Laila RaySEO executive director at the Amsive Marketing Agency, the idea of fewer visitors with higher quality is still insufficient – and it represents an existential threat. “How do publishers, content creators and people who earn money through offer ads and traffic earn money in the future?” You ask. One possible answer is partnerships. Conde Nast, WIRED publisher, has a commercial deal with Openai to provide articles on ChatgPT search answers. The company does not have a similar deal with Google.
Despite Ray’s concerns, its initial impression of artificial intelligence mode is positive. “In my experience so far, I find it a better product than an artificial intelligence overview.” She says. From Ray’s point of view, Beta of Ai Mode was more successful than an artificial intelligence overview of understanding questions and providing accurate answers. Based on my initial impressions, the ability to ask follow -up questions on similar topics seems to be improving. I faced errors during the test.
I asked the Beta version of the artificial intelligence situation, “Have the Giants win”, to find out how it will answer a common and regional sports question. “Yes, San Francisco’s giants lost their latest match against Colorado Rockez,” he answered. The most anxiety, the artificial intelligence situation was martyred with social media publications from X, as racist and apparent research on the national intelligence rate in Africa was repeated.
“Sierra Leone has a very low intelligence degree compared to the global average,” read one result of the test. “The average intelligence rate was reported in Sierra Leone 45.07.” This is a very specific number, and it comes from the research exposed by the white outstanding people in its closure and spread over the Internet. After conducting a wire investigation last year, this showed similar numbers that appear in the answers of multiple search engines of artificial intelligence, Google stopped AI’s overview answers for national research inquiries in intelligence. At the time of the test, he did not take the same precautions to release beta from artificial intelligence mode.
I asked Google to comment on my fears about the accuracy of the experiences of searching for artificial intelligence, and received a response. “The accuracy rate for the appearance working in artificial intelligence is equal with other established search features such as distinct excerpts, which provides useful information for a decade,” says Craig Iwir, a Google spokesman. “We continue to achieve more gains in areas such as realism, and these improvements teach how to deal with artificial intelligence mode.”
Since Google has long dominated the search engine market, the company has also formed the internet structure to suit the equal algorithm. Even if they are disappointed with changes, many publishers feel that they have no choice but to play if they want their websites to continue to appear at the highest Google search results. Google may eat more in clicking rates to appear because they tend greatly to the search results created by artificial intelligence. The rapid transition can affect publishers online, many of whom are already working in financially fraught positions and depend on Google’s search as a major traffic engine.
“This is the future of Google’s research, so we have to adapt to publishers and researchers,” said Schwartz. “Embrace the change, I think.”
