NVIDIA had another major event in CES this year, which included CEO JenSen Huang’s The main address. There was a lot of amazing things in the main huang, but there is one thing that really caught my attention and that was NemoAn offer to help AIS to use the company. What fascinated me is that the elements that Huang described from NEMO is a variety of digital libraries that train AIS how to interact with others, understand culture, and understand language restrictions and understanding, all of which confirm that new artificial intelligence can smoothly combine it with the company that implements it.
What is ironic is that human resources rarely do any of this, especially with regard to remote human employees. In fact, with NEMO, companies will do much better in AIS on board AIS with real people. I do not suggest that you avoid Nemo because of this, but may take the elements in NEMO and AI and use them to improve your new employees, especially remote employees.
Let’s talk about that this week because we are increasingly using developments to help AIS perform better jobs than people and not doing enough to use technology to improve the integration of human employees, I think, it will lead to that human employees are increasingly able to compete with their artificial intelligence counterparts.
People in exchange for artificial intelligence
In the seventies of the last century, when I was doing the first university stage of my second certificate, which focused on manpower management, a professional path was disrupted when he discovered that the use of science to choose employees to employ and promote was discriminatory. The reason for this is that most minorities were deprived of education that was necessary to be able to compete, so they were deprived of the test. Instead of reforming the education problem, the US government launched (EEOC Equal Committee). This effort tried to force diversity without correcting the basic educational problem and managing a largely banned workforce because it looks discriminatory.
It is great for me that artificial intelligence has no kind of discrimination problem; We have offers like NEMO that uses technology to integrate AIS into the companies they will serve. The approach focuses on selecting artificial intelligence only on its capabilities. There may be some discrimination based on the company that established artificial intelligence depending on the place where that company is located or the brand is visualized for that company, but since these things are not people, we do not feel the need to overcome this type of discrimination, so we choose Amnesty International programming and confirm its training without any concern about discrimination.
This is what we should do with employees: Determine them based on their capabilities and then make sure they are fully able to integrate with the people who will work with them. NVIDIA talked about physical artificial intelligence and tools like the universe that train robots to better interact with other robots and people around them. This may lead to a lot of better training and much better integration efforts than humans.
Robots already have huge possible advantages on their human counterparts because they can generally work longer and more difficult and in areas that will harm or kill humans. It is stronger, never sick, and can be easily fixed than people.
Closing: We need NEMO and Cosmos for people
I do not refer to what Nvidia is doing. What I suggest is that we adopt the same training concepts and adapt them to training in human employees. There is no doubt that AIS and robots will replace most of the jobs currently performs, but this trend can be more manageable and is published over a longer period of time if we also work to improve the tools we use to train, choose and choose human employees. There is no reason for AIS and robots clearly on people. Technology can be used to improve both. The future in which all people who are employed optimally are employed, and it is a future, will be a better world than what we have now or what we will end up if humans become old prematurely.
Like what should have been done in the seventies of the last century in order to ensure that everyone has the same training opportunities regardless of the mode of the minority, we need to work to ensure that humans do not become the new deprived minority by applying similar learnings to train people we use on artificial intelligence. If we do not, we will watch ourselves prematurely.
So, while I salute what NVIDIA did with NEMO and universeWe also need to make similar efforts to ensure that humans can remain able to compete with artificial intelligence and their robots (Such one for doctors) Publishing the transition, so we will have time to know the roles that humans should play in Amnesty International and our automatic future.
