When the Supreme Court of Arizona issued its ruling in a pair of Burn and The only identity document Issues this month, this announcement has not been presented by the judge or the spokesperson, but instead by two of the AI deities that can be almost unmarried out of real people.
Daniel and Victoria are the latest faces created by computer in the Supreme Court in Arizona as part of an attempt to create how justice is connected to the public.
“I think it is just an effective way for us to get the news,” said Communications Director Alberto Rodriguez. “It is really an opportunity for us to meet the public as they consume their media.”
Rodriguez is the man behind the device that helped design the sound and appearance of his virtual work. He says that artificial intelligence technology allowed his team to reduce production time to obtain a video statement of the video from up to six hours to a few minutes.
Although the process has become more efficient, Rodriguez is not concerned about becoming old, noting that every download still requires a human touch.
“As much as I take over the position of the public information official, I do not think this is a problem because it still takes the workforce,” he said. “We still have to work with the bench to ensure that we are getting accurate information.”
The head of the Supreme Court in Arizona Ann Timer confirms that every word that the public hears from the avatar was written by the judges themselves. It hopes that additional attention will help improve the public’s confidence in the court.
“For years, we took this to be rejected by it, of course you trust in the courts, of course you trust in the judges.” We are doing our best and these are people working hard. “But if people do not believe in that, this does not matter.”
While Daniel and Victoria may become the most examples of the front of artificial intelligence in the legal system, Timmer notes that the law profession already uses artificial intelligence every day to help legal research, document reviews and data analysis.
However, the use of artificial intelligence in the legal system is not without controversy. One prosecutor in New York tried to use Artificial intelligence lawyer argues his case Before being closed by the Appeals Committee. Throughout the country in California, the state bar faced severe criticism from the legal community after revealing that some questions in the state exam in February were written using artificial intelligence.
With the continued growth of artificial intelligence in the law, as well as concerns about hallucinogenic cases of artificial intelligence and martyrdom for cases that were not present in legal deposits.
Timmer emphasizes that although these fears are valid, the Supreme Court of Arizona knows where to draw the line.
“This artificial intelligence, at least we use, is not born,” said Timer. “We will use artificial intelligence to start replacing the ruling, I don’t think that will happen.”
