A federal judge reprimanded Apple strongly, and found that the iPhone manufacturer deliberately violated a court order in a court to combat monopoly before.Fortnite“The epic playmaker.
American boycott judge, iPhone Gonzales Rogers, ordered the company to reduce barriers that previously protecting the exclusive payment system for digital transactions within the application and allowing developers to display links to alternative options. On Wednesday, I found that Apple violated a judicial order in 2021, as she wrote, sought to “curb and ban the behavior of the iPhone anti -competition” and pricing.
“It will not be tolerated with Apple’s attempts to interfere in the competition,” said Gonzalez Rogers on Wednesday’s decision, which Apple held in contempt.
She ordered that Apple “no longer hinders the ability of developers to communicate with users and will not impose or impose a new commission on the purchases outside the application.”
In a statement submitted to CBS News on Wednesday night, Apple spokesman said: “We disagree strongly with the decision. We will adhere to the court order and we will appeal.”
EPIC first filed a lawsuit to combat monopoly in 2020, claiming that Apple has illegal monopoly about the famous application store that makes billions of dollars annually from an exclusive payment system at the time collecting commissions ranging from 15 % to 30 % on trading within the application.
Although Gonzalez Rogers has rejected monopoly claims, Apple has ordered the reduction of barriers that previously protecting the exclusive payment system for digital transactions within the application and allowing developers to display links with alternative options. The Supreme Court rejected Apple’s appeal in the case in January 2024.
The judge wrote on Wednesday, “In a blatant contradiction with Apple’s initial testimony within the court, contemporary business documents reveal that Apple knew exactly what she was doing, and in every turn she chose the most competitive option,” the judge wrote on Wednesday. She accused Apple’s vice president of funding Alex Roman from “frank” lying under the department.
Gonzalez Rogers wrote, “” (Apple CEO) has long called Philip Schiller to agree with Apple with the upholstery order, but (CEO) Tim Cook ignored Schiller and instead allowed the financial manager Luka Maysty and his team to his commission to persuade him otherwise. Cook badly. “
The judge referred the command to the US lawyer for the northern region of California to investigate whether criminal contempt procedures were appropriate.
The Ministry of Justice submitted A comprehensive lawsuit to combat monopoly Again last year, claiming that the technology giant participated in a series of efforts to strangle the competition.