CETUS Protocol on X that “the attacker has stolen about $ 223 million” of encryption pools in the liquidity completed in the highest controversy in governance in the history of SUI short. The team wrote that he “took an immediate action to close our contract to prevent further theft of money,” adding that “$ 162 million of the hacked money has been successfully suspended … We are working with SUI and other ecosystem members now on the next step solutions” promising “a full accident report.”
The encryption community erupts after the exploitation of Sui
These solutions that define the next step sparked a philosophical battle. To maintain the stolen assets on the chain, one of the super majority of auditors agreed to ignore the transactions issued by the three -controlled headlines. Founder of the electronic capital, Justin Bones Argue The action of the blacklist explains the structural centralization: “SUI staff colludes to control TXs for the infiltrator at the present time! … Does this make sui central? Quoting only 114 honesty and founder – maker, declared: “The” founders “possess the majority of the show and there are only 114 honesty!”
Amog Gupta from the Sui Foundation reported that this step was a legal exercise of distributed governance. “Just because the auditors reach a consensus on something, it does not mean that they” collude. ” […] Contractors on other chains (take over) can do the same. He wrote, “The important point is that these capabilities are not specific to SUI,” The holy cup of decentralization, ETHEREUM, has done something similar in 2023 when it prevented OFAC’s transactions, “adding,” The point is that this ability is not for SUI. Offac is a gray area […] But the penetration is clear like today, so there is no dispute over being good or bad. “
Bons refused to measure. You are misleading about the 2023 OFAC regulations: ETH TX was not controlled, as collusion was impossible […] A bonus distribution of power is concentrated to the point that this is possible in the first place is the problem. More than 84 % of the amazing supplies are kept by the founders! […] One party dominates consensus is the definition of centralization! “
Gupta answered that the number of audited is a red herring. “NC [Nakamoto coefficient] It is literally the only scale that matters and the number of auditors is the most misleading and able scale for the game when it comes to measuring decentralization. I can get 1,000 tail health, but all of them are useless if someone has more than 33 percent of a share. Bons once again released: “Will you really defend the fact that” control of the founders “is more than 80 % of the class? 114 auditors are very low, at least must be above 1 thousand to avoid this type of censorship. “
The conflict pour beyond two encryption heroes. Fabda.ETH (Fabdarice) argued that freezing “proves, again, that only one Blockchain is appropriate to secure the global economy … there is only one ethereum and the amount is ETH.” Jabriel Shapiro’s encryption lawyer Repeat This feelings: “Remember, that every series of smart nodes other than ETHEREUM is just the participation of the institution; Sui Hacker moves from SUI to ETH because ETHEREUM is controlled.” Sssesbi encoding the reputable blow in a more clear language summarized: “It seems that only they shot themselves in the foot … ignoring transactions and prohibiting transactions is something that a central database can do.”
The sounds within the SUI ecosystem insist that the mechanism is “emergency brakes”, not accepting hierarchical control. Community teacher Nevary. Make up: “In rare exploits, on a large scale such as the CETUS protocol today, SUI can meet and reach the consensus to deny encryption transactions from a specific malicious wallet. This is not automatic or central control. There are two main things that make it uncomfortable: it only occurs in extreme cases and a total number of huge honesty requires the influence.” And he concluded: “Ski is disgraced; the network is safe; asset recovery tools-used with caution and consensus.”
Currently, the numbers prefer freezing: CETUS says, “162 million dollars have been suspended successfully hacked,” while the attacker retains the control of about 61 million dollars directed to Ethereum. Whether the intervention of the auditor will develop into a permanent protocol feature or remains a one -time response is the governance dilemma that SUI must settle in public opinion.
At the time of the press, SUI was traded at $ 3.61.
Distinctive image created with Dall.e, Chart from TradingView.com
Editing process For Bitcoinist, it is focused on providing accurate, accurate and non -biased content. We support strict resource standards, and each page is subject to a diligent review by our team of senior technology experts and experienced editors. This process guarantees the integrity of our content, importance and value of our readers.
