The Massachusetts Institute L -Liqn says
The relevant paper wrote, “Artificial Intelligence, Scientific Discovery, and Product Innovation”, by a PhD student in the university’s economy program. He claimed that he explained that the introduction of the artificial intelligence tool into the large non -specific material science laboratory led to the discovery of more materials and more patent files, but at the expense of reducing the satisfaction of those looking for their work.
Massachusetts Institute of Economic Technology Darwin Asimoglu (which recently He won the Nobel PrizeDavid Outor praised the paper last year, with Autor tell Wall Street Journal It was “land”. In a statement included in Announcement of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology On Friday, Acemoglu and Autor described the paper as “already known and widely discussed in AI and Science literature, although it was not published in any specific magazine.”
However, the two economists said that they are now “have no confidence in the source of the data source, its reliability, or the validity of the data and the validity of the research.”
According to wsjThe computer world with experience in material science is close to ACEMOGLU and Autor with concerns in January. They brought those concerns to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, which led to an internal review.
The Massachusetts Institute says Lahnn and while the university’s announcement does not mention both of them Pre -layer version of the paper And his primary press coverage as Idan Toner-Rodgers. (TECHCRUNCH Communication with ink ink for comment.)
“So far, the author has not done so,” says Massachusetts Institute apparently.
