Washington On Thursday, the Federal Appeals Court in Washington suspended the decision of the Federal Commerce Court, which prevents most of the sweeping definitions of President Trump, at now, to return the fees imposed by the President under the Emergency Authority Law.
The US Appeals Court of the Federal Department said in A. Brief It will give the Trump administration’s request for an immediate administrative residence “to the extent that the permanent agricultural rulings and orders that the International Trade Court have been temporarily made in these cases” at the present time “.
A committee of three judges in the Commercial Court Unanimously Wednesday that the 1977 Economic Forces Law, which Mr. Trump protested with the imposition of fees, did not give the president the authority to put an unlimited tariff on imports from almost every foreign country.
the American International Trade Court Mr. Trump’s tariff was prohibited by 10 % permanently on almost every American trading partner, as well as the president’s duties in imports from Mexico, Canada and China, which the President imposed in response to what he said was drug trafficking in the United States that the judges gave the Trump administration 10 days to put their permanent penis.
“IEPA does not allow any tariff orders all over the world, revenge or trafficking.” “The tariff orders around the world and revenge exceed any authority that the president gives by IEPA to regulate import through definitions.”
The Ministry of Justice asked the Federal Department to review the Commercial Court’s decision and also requested that this ruling be suspended while considering the appeal. The administration warned in a file on Thursday against absenteeism of temporary relief, as it will move to the Supreme Court “to avoid national security and economic damage that cannot be reformed at stake.”
In a statement submitted to CBS News, White House spokesman Kush Desi described the referee on Thursday as “a positive development of industries and workers in America.”
“The Trump administration is still committed to addressing national emergency situations in our country to drug trafficking and historical deficit with every legal authority that the president gives the constitution and Congress.” “Regardless of the developments of this litigation, the president will continue to use all the tools at his disposal to enhance the commercial policy of all Americans.”
In its brief arrangement, the Federal Department gave two groups of US-fifth-based prosecutors and a group from 12 states to June 5 to respond to the Trump administration’s request for residence. The Court of Appeal approved the consideration of the pair of cases together.
The American International Trade Court’s decision was a major setback for Mr. Trump’s economic schedule, its axis is its tariff. The president argued that duties are necessary The return of manufacturing jobs For the United States Will Use more than 1 trillion dollars In revenue. Mr. Trump also used definitions and threatened higher rates as a lift to force commercial partners on negotiations.
The President has launched a 10 % tariff, in addition to a group of “mutual” tariffs that were now thrown, in April about what the White House call “Tahrir Day”.
However, the president’s tariff shook financial markets and raised fears of economic shrinkage. Mr. Trump also has I stopped some dutiesIncluding “mutual” definitions on 57 commercial partners.
Mr. Trump’s use of IEPA to impose customs tariffs has led to more than half of a scale of lawsuits from states and companies affected by duties. Prosecutors argued that the president had no power to slap customs duties on one -sided commercial partners, which had not been used before this way.
The three judges in the American International Trade Court agreed, where they wrote in their decision that “IEPA does not read to grant such unlimited power.”
In a separate conflict brought by two Games -based Games, the American boycott judge, Rudolph Contraras, had spent that the tariff of Mr. Trump imposed under the Law of Emergency Forces is illegal.
Contraras I found that IEPA “The president is not allowed to impose the definitions stipulated” in his executive orders and prevent the Trump administration from collecting any tariff derived from the two companies. The judge has stopped his order for 14 days to give the Ministry of Justice time to appeal to the American Appeals Court of the Colombia County Department, which the administration said will do.
The case, Contreras wrote in a 33 pages“About whether IEPA enables the president to impose, cancel, stop, stop, restore definitions and set definitions to rearrange the global economy. The court agrees with the prosecutors that he does not.”
