According to Cleej, the only solution is to apply to tension between artists and artificial intelligence companies is to give artists ways to disturb training, which was began to settle in 2022.
“A lot of voices say,” You can just training my content, [if you] First, ask, “Clegg said,” and I must say that I am astonished by it as somewhat unreasonable because these systems are trained in huge amounts of data. “
In X, the CEO of Trained Trained to some extent-non-profit organizations that support the fight against artists against the NEWUTON-Rex (Also, a former deputy head of stability from Ai Audio) to the Cleg Class Class in A. mail Thousands are seen.
“Nick Cling is wrong to say that the demands of artists on artificial intelligence and copyright are not applicable,” Newton Rex said. “Every argument it offers can be equal to NAPSTER:” First, “The technique is there,” secondly that “the license takes time,” and thirdly, “we cannot control what other countries do.” “These are not reasons for not supporting the law and the treatment of creators fairly,” said Newton Rex.
Mocked from other social media users Clegg with jokes aimed at destroying the preferred artificial intelligence companies’ argument against copyright claims.
Blackbird says that the demand for sailors, with permission to ascend and loot their ships, “kills” piracy in the upper seas, “X user with” Seanchuckle “handle. books.
On Bluesky, the trial lawyer, Max Kennerly, actually sarcastically, Klij and the entire artificial intelligence industry by writing, “Our product creates a little value that it is not applicable in the market, not even as a specialized product. Therefore, we must be allowed to extract the value from one side of the work of others and convert this value to our profits.”
